Oncor's 765-kV transmission plan faces widening scrutiny
Oncor’s 765-kV transmission push has shifted from a large grid-buildout plan into a contested proceeding with growing procedural resistance. Across the reports, critics moved from policy and land-use objections to formal challenges over notice, water impacts, reliability claims, and whether the project is needed at all.
The dispute has also broadened beyond Oncor itself. Lawmakers, local officials, and state reviewers have all pushed for more scrutiny, while the company has defended the line as necessary for West Texas and Permian Basin demand. The immediate result is delay, with the Public Utility Commission sending the case back for more review instead of issuing a final approval.
The project remains under review, with no final approval reported and the case pushed back for more administrative review.
Oncor challenged a recommendation against the project
Oncor pushed back after an administrative recommendation to deny the application, arguing the line is needed for rising demand in West Texas. The dispute also gained a notice issue, with concerns raised for about 1,400 landowners.
Reported by dailytrib.com · Detail
Local officials raised water and coordination concerns
Attention shifted to the Bell County East to Big Hill line, where local officials questioned effects on water resources and whether water agencies had been properly involved. That added a local permitting and resource-use challenge to the project.
Reported by texasscorecard.com · Detail
State grid policy became part of the broader dispute
Reporting then linked the transmission buildout to Texas’s no-bid policy, turning the issue into a fight over whether the state should keep its current contracting model. The debate expanded from this project to how Texas pays for major grid work.
Reported by eenews.net · Detail
Lawmakers urged a pause before the next legislative session
Two lawmakers asked regulators to hold the project until after the 2027 session, tying their objection to landowner concerns and the project’s generation assumptions. That moved the dispute from general criticism to a request for an explicit pause.
Reported by texasscorecard.com · Detail
What to watch
- The remanded case will go back to administrative law judges for additional review of reliability standards and congestion cost savings.
- The Public Utility Commission is still expected to issue a later decision after that review.
Track Oncor Electric Delivery yourself, free
Get a daily briefing tailored to your role, tracking Oncor Electric Delivery and any company or market you choose.
Create my Oncor Electric Delivery briefing →